Research Article

Integrative Medicine Case Reports, Volume 3, Issue 2 (July), 2022

 

Efficacy of AYUSH Common Yoga protocol along with Surya Namaskar on the Dyslipidemia subjects in Haryana

Jaideep Arya1*, Divya Singh2, Harshit Manav3, Kalyan Maity4,5, Yashvi Bhat6, Rohin Vinayak7, Saras Jyoti1, Shweta Ahuja8, Monika Gautam9, Navneet Kaur10, Jyoti Arya11 and Gurmeet Singh12

1Haryana Yog Aayog, AYUSH Department, Panchkula, Haryana, India
2Center of Integrative Medicine and Research (CIMR), All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India
3Lal Bahadur Shastri National Academy of Administration, (Govt. of India), Mussoorie, Uttarakhand, India
4Division of Yoga and Life Sciences, Swami Vivekananda Yoga Anusandhana Samsthana (S-VYASA), Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
5Neuroscience Research Lab, Department of Neurology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India
6Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER), Mohali, Punjab, India
7Dayanand Medical College & Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
8Trinity Hospital and Medical Research Institute, Mohali, Punjab, India
9Collaborative Centre for Mind Body Interventions through Yoga, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
10Government Model Sanskrit Senior Secondary School, Morni Hills, Panchkula, Haryana, India
11Patanjali Ayurvedic College, UAU Uttarakhand, India
12Department of Physical Education, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India

     

KEY WORDS

 

ABSTRACT

CVD
Dyslipidemia
HDL-C
Surya Namaskar
Yoga
Common Yoga Protocol

 

Background: Dyslipidemia might be the cause of many cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Yoga intervention is known to prevent the progression of various lifestyle-based health conditions. Dyslipidemia marks the onset of early CVD, and a Yoga based-intervention at this stage might reverse the progression.

Aim: To analyze the effect of AYUSH Common Yoga Protocol (CYP) and CYP combined with Surya Namaskar (CYP-SN) on dyslipidemia subjects in Haryana.

Method: A three-arm randomized controlled trial was carried out in which ninety individuals were allocated into three groups, CYP group, CYP-SN group and control group.

Result: The three-month intervention resulted in elevation of HDL- cholesterol (HDL-C) levels in the group that had undergone CYP protocol, as well as CYP-SN protocol, implying the benefits of Surya Namaskar in modifying lipid profile reflecting an improvement in the dyslipidemia.

Conclusion: CYP and CYP-SN Yoga group when practiced regularly for a sustained period can help in reducing co-morbidity and severe CVD in subjects with dyslipidemia. When implemented in dynamic way, CYP-SN has shown to have a greater impact in management of dyslipidemia.

doi: 10.38205/imcr.030242

*Corresponding Author:
Jaideep Arya, Chairman
Haryana Yog Aayog, AYUSH Department,
Panchkula, Haryana, India
Contact no: +91-9760095100
E-mail: jaiarya1973@gmail.com

 

Introduction

Dyslipidemia is a modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease associated mortality and morbidity (1). Patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) have disturbed level of LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), elevated triglycerides, and reduced HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) levels in the blood. The combination of elevated triglycerides and reduced HDL-C is of paramount importance in detecting the onset of an underlying disorder of glucose homeostasis, insulin resistance (IR), or Diabetes Mellitus (DM2). Numerous studies have shown a relationship between lifestyle-related disorders such as dyslipidemia, diabetes, and hypertension (13). Dyslipidemia is related to the increased risk for accumulation of diabetes and hypertension (2,3). Concisely, dyslipidemia, diabetes, hypertension, and obesity contributed to the elevation of CVD (4). This is observed that more than 50% adult population has dyslipidemia across the world (24). An epidemiological study in India reported that 25–30% of urban and 15–20% of the rural population have elevated levels of cholesterol (5). Dyslipidemia is an alteration in the lipoprotein metabolism that encompasses lipoprotein overproduction/deficiency. It is also reported that patients who has background of ischemic stroke, Transient ischemic attack (TIA) and atherosclerosis having LDL-C level of less than 70 mg/dL possess less risk of subsequent stroke and other CVD than those who had LDL cholesterol of 90 mg/dL to 110 mg/dL (6). Recent findings show that pharmacological drugs like Ezetimibe or Proprotein convertase subtilisin–Kexin type 9 inhibitors plus statins can be beneficial in stroke reduction owing to their triglyceride lowering properties (7). Regardless of medications, patients are advised to adopt a healthy lifestyle and regular exercise for CVD risk reduction. After considering comorbidities, statin therapy is recommended for further prevention (6). In India, the estimated economic burden of heart disease on non-medical spending per person amounts to INT$110.64 (INT-international dollar) annually, hence suggesting dyslipidemia as a factor contributing to the financial burden (8). In addition to this, various studies have shown the effectiveness of mind-body intervention in reducing triglycerides levels, hence preventing progression of dyslipidemia into advanced CVD (9).

Yoga is an ancient Indian technique that aims to balance mind and body through Yoga postures (asanas) and breathing practices (pranayama), followed by meditation (dhyana). Yoga intervention has been shown to maintain body mass index blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory system while reducing psychological stress and inflammatory conditions (911). Yoga has also been proven to significantly reduce the lipid concentrations such as TG, VLDL and LDL levels in CKD patients (12). Moreover, the studies conducted on Indian people with diabetes and pre-diabetes proven that yoga-based lifestyle intervention programs assist in alleviating the comorbidity related with dyslipidemia in both genders and rural/urban areas (1314). Therefore, it is a cost-effective and non-pharmacological method to manage blood dyslipidemia and prevent progression as well early development of CVD. In this study, we aimed to test the standardized CYP in one group and CYP-SN in another group, for its health benefits in patients with dyslipidemia condition.

Methods

Study design

The current study was a three-arm randomized controlled trial to analyze the effect of CYP and CYP-SN on dyslipidemia subjects in Haryana, India. The study was started after approval from the Institutional Ethical Committee of Haryana Yog Council.

image

Figure 1: Flow chart of study participants

Participants

The study was conducted from October 2020 to January 2021. The patients were recruited from Prakratik Chikitsalya, Bhiwani district, Haryana, India. Based on inclusion and exclusion criteria we have selected the participants for the study. The inclusion criteria were a) Age: 25–55 years, b) B.P: 140/120mmhg or above, c) Both Genders (Male/Female), d) Mild to Moderate patients with Dyslipidemia. The exclusion criteria were a) pregnant women b) people receiving chemotherapy c) patients with severe dyslipidemia d) patients with severe hypertension, heart disease, or any medical condition, e) person who is already a yoga practitioner.

Screening and recruitment

Only those participants who had given written consent were screened through lipid profile tests. Further, A total of 90 participants were screened from 180 screened participants based on deranged lipid profile test scores.

Sample size calculation

The sample size was calculated based on the previous paper on yoga therapy on lipid profile with 80% power and 0.05 relative precision (15). The total calculated sample size was 90 (30 in each group).

Randomization

After recruitment, 90 participants were equally randomized into 3 group’s viz. control group (n = 30), CYP (n = 30), CYP-SN group by lottery methods.

Intervention

Among the three groups, 1st group i.e. control group followed their daily routine for three months without any intervention. 2nd group i.e. CYP practiced common yoga protocol (13) (Table 1), 3rd group i.e. practiced CYP-SN (Fast Surya-Namaskar) for three months (Table 2). Both groups (2 and 3) practiced 5 days per week for three months. The duration for the protocol for 2nd group and 3rd group was 45 minutes and 1 hour, respectively.

Table 1: Description of Common Yoga Protocol for AYUSH YP group

Common Yoga Protocol

SL. No.

Practice

Duration (minutes)

1.

Prayer

2

2.

Loosening Practices

Neck Bending (Grivā Śakti Vikāsaka)

5

Shoulder’s movement

Trunk Movement (Kati Śakti Vikāsaka)

Knee Movement

3.

Yogasanas

Standing Postures

Tāḍāsana

1

Vṛkṣāsana

1

Pāda-Hastāsana

1

Ardha Cakrāsana

1

Trikoṇāsana

1

 

 

Sitting Postures

Bhadrāsana

1

 

 

Vajrāsana/Vīrāsana

1

 

 

Ardha Uṣṭrāsana (for beginners)

1

 

 

Uṣṭrāsana

1

 

 

Śaśankāsana

1

 

 

Uttāna Maṇḍūkāsana

1

 

 

Marīchyāsana/Vakrāsana

1

 

 

Prone Postures

Makarāsana

1

 

 

Bhujaṅgāsana

1

 

 

Śalabhāsana

1

 

 

Supine Postures

Setubandhāsana

1

 

 

Uttānapādāsana

1

 

 

Ardhahalāsana

1

 

 

Pavanamuktāsana

1

 

 

Śavāsana

1

4.

Kapālabhāti

2

5.

Prāṇāyāma

Naḍīśodhana/Anuloma Viloma Prāṇāyāma

2

Śītalī Prāṇāyāma

2

Bhrāmarī Prāṇāyāma

2

6.

Dhyāna

8

7.

Saṅkalpa

1

8.

Śāntiḥ Pāṭha

1

Total Time

45 minutes

Table 2: Description of CYP-SN Group protocol

Common Yoga Protocol + Surya Namaskara

SL. No.

Practice

Duration (minutes)

1.

Prayer

2

2.

Loosening Practices

Neck Bending (Grivā Śakti Vikāsaka)

5

Shoulder’s movement

Trunk Movement (Kati Śakti Vikāsaka)

Knee Movement

3.

Yogasanas

Standing Postures

Tāḍāsana

1

Vṛkṣāsana

1

Pāda-Hastāsana

1

Ardha Cakrāsana

1

Trikoṇāsana

1

Sitting Postures

Bhadrāsana

1

Vajrāsana/Vīrāsana

1

Ardha Uṣṭrāsana (for beginners)

1

Uṣṭrāsana

1

Śaśankāsana

1

Uttāna Maṇḍūkāsana

1

Marīchyāsana/Vakrāsana

1

Prone Postures

Makarāsana

1

Bhujaṅgāsana

1

Śalabhāsana

1

Supine Postures

Setubandhāsana

1

Uttānapādāsana

1

Ardhahalāsana

1

Pavanamuktāsana

1

Śavāsana

1

4.

Kapālabhāti

2

5.

Prāṇāyāma

Naḍīśodhana/Anuloma Viloma Prāṇāyāma

2

Śītalī Prāṇāyāma

2

Bhrāmarī Prāṇāyāma

2

6.

Dhyāna

8

7.

Saṅkalpa

1

8.

Śāntiḥ Pāṭha

1

9.

6 rounds Surya Namaskara (12 steps)

2 min per round (2 × 6 = 12 min) + 3 min relaxation = 15 min

Total Time

60 minutes

Outcome measures

Outcomes Measures included estimation of parameters such as Total Cholesterol, Triglycerides, HDL (High density Lipoprotein), VLDL (Very Low density Lipoprotein), LDL, TC-HDL Ratio, LDL-HDL Ratio at baseline and after three months. The estimation for the lipid parameters was done in the NABL compliant lab.

Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis in the present study was done by using the SPSS 21 software. One-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was done to check the normality of the data. The P-value of the normality test was >0.05, hence all the data were normally distributed. To compare pre and post data we performed Paired Sample test (Parametric test). To find out the differences between the CYP group, CYP-SN group and Control group the ANOVA test was performed. Level of significance was considered at <0.05.

Results

Table 3: Demographic details of CYP group, CYP-SN group and control group

Demographic data

CYP Group (N = 12)

CYP-SN Group (N = 23)

Control Group (N = 17)

Age (Years)

46.58 ± 9.94

45.26 ± 8.95

43.23 ± 9.23

Male

6 (50%)

13 (56.52%)

8 (47.06%)

Female

6 (50%)

10 (43.48%)

9 (52.94%)

Table 4: Baseline characteristics of the participants

Lipid parameters

CYP Group (N = 12)

CYP-SN Group (N = 23)

Control Group (N = 17)

TC (mg/dl)

225.5 ± 38.02

203.22 ± 52.39

196.68 ± 41.38

TG (mg/dl)

193.33 ± 65.49

138.65 ± 82.42

169.54 ± 38.63

HDL (mg/dl)

48.75 ± 6.90

48.52 ± 2.98

45.87 ± 2.85

VLDL (mg/dl)

38.66 ± 13.09

27.71 ± 16.49

33.89 ± 7.74

LDL (mg/dl)

138.08 ± 29.67

126.98 ± 46.58

116.86 ± 40.55

TC-HDL Ratio (Ratio)

4.65 ± 0.64

4.19 ± 1.13

4.31 ± 0.93

LDL-HDL Ratio (Ratio)

2.86 ± 0.65

2.63 ± 1.02

2.57 ± 0.90

TC = Total Cholesterol; TG = Triglycerides; HDL = High density lipoprotein; VLDL = Very low density lipoprotein; LDL = Low density lipoprotein.

Demographic details and baseline characteristics of the participants

Table 3 revealed the demographic details of the participants in selected groups i.e. CYP group, CYP-SN group and Control group. The average age of the participants is 46.58, 45.26 and 43.23 for CYP group, CYP-SN group and Control group respectively. The percentage of male and female participants in the CYP group (Male-50%, Female-50%), CYP-SN group (Male-56.52%, Female-43.48%) and Control group (Male-47.06%, Female-52.94%) was also shown in Table 1. Moreover, the baseline characteristics of the participants were also postulated in the Table 4.

AYUSH YP group shows significant improvement on Cholesterol levels

As per Table 5, within-group analysis showed that in CYP Group, the common yoga protocol significantly reduces cholesterol after three months of intervention, from 225.5 ± 38.02 mg/dL to 210.16 ± 29.28 mg/dl with significant pre-post difference (p-value = 0.026). No significant changes were observed on other lipid parameters viz. in TG (p = 0.415), HDL (p = 0.161), LDL (p = 0.065), VLDL (p = 0.065), TC-HDL Ratio (p = 0.408), LDL-HDL Ratio (p = 0.567) after three months of CYP practice. However, the mean improvement was exhibited in Triglycerides from 193.33 ± 65.49 to 185.75 ± 75.54 and LDL from 138.08 ± 29.67 to 125.93 ± 29.60 respectively.

Table 5: Showing changes in lipid profile in CYP group

CYP Group (N = 12)

Lipid parameters

Test condition

Mean ± SD

95 % CI

t-value

P-value

Lower

Upper

TC (mg/dl)

Pre test

225.5 ± 38.02

2.2381

28.4285

2.577

0.026

Post test

210.16 ± 29.28

TG (mg/dl)

Pre test

193.33 ± 65.49

–12.1093

27.2760

0.848

0.415

Post test

185.75 ± 75.54

HDL (mg/dl)

Pre test

48.75 ± 6.90

–0.7766

4.1100

1.501

0.161

Post test

47.08 ± 6.68

VLDL (mg/dl)

Pre test

38.66 ± 13.09

–2.4219

5.4552

0.848

0.415

Post test

37.15 ± 15.10

LDL (mg/dl)

Pre test

138.08 ± 29.67

–0.9207

25.2207

2.046

0.065

Post test

125.93 ± 29.60

TC-HDL Ratio (Ratio)

Pre test

4.65 ± 0.64

–0.20248

0.46248

0.861

0.408

Post test

4.52 ± 0.75

LDL-HDL Ratio (Ratio)

Pre test

2.86 ± 0.65

–0.17192

0.43025

0.944

0.365

Post test

2.73 ± 0.79

Data are expressed in mean, SD, t-value, CI and statistical significance. TC = Total Cholesterol; TG = Triglycerides; HDL = High density lipoprotein; VLDL = Very low density lipoprotein; LDL = Low density lipoprotein; CI = Confidence Interval; SD = Standard Deviation.

Table 6: Showing changes in lipid profile in CYP-SN group

CYP-SN Group (N = 23)

Lipid parameters

Test condition

Mean ± SD

95 % CI

t-value

P-value

Lower

Upper

TC (mg/dl)

Post test

203.22 ± 52.39

–1.4789

21.4876

1.807

0.084

Post test

193.21 ± 44.33

TG (mg/dl)

Post test

138.65 ± 82.42

–23.2601

8.5644

–0.958

0.349

Post test

146 ± 67.33

HDL (mg/dl)

Post test

48.52 ± 2.98

–0.7633

1.8938

0.882

0.387

Post test

47.95 ± 4.52

VLDL (mg/dl)

Post test

27.71 ± 16.49

–4.6643

1.6991

–0.966

0.344

Post test

29.2 ± 13.46

LDL (mg/dl)

Post test

126.98 ± 46.58

–1.2892

22.2718

1.847

0.078

Post test

116.49 ± 39.24

TC-HDL Ratio (Ratio)

Post test

4.19 ± 1.13

–0.176693

0.391041

0.783

0.442

Post test

4.09 ± 1.03

LDL-HDL Ratio (Ratio)

Post test

2.63 ± 1.02

–0.11646

0.42863

1.18

0.248

Post test

2.47 ± 0.90

Data are expressed in mean, SD, t-value, CI and statistical significance. TC = Total Cholesterol; TG = Triglycerides; HDL = High density lipoprotein; VLDL = Very low density lipoprotein; LDL = Low density lipoprotein; CI = Confidence Interval; SD = Standard Deviation.

Table 7: Showing changes in lipid profile in Control group

Control Group (N = 17)

Lipid parameters

Test condition

Mean ± SD

95 % CI

t-value

P-value

Lower

Upper

TC (mg/dl)

Post test

196.68 ± 41.38

–9.4252

19.4958

0.738

0.471

Post test

191.64 ± 36.43

TG (mg/dl)

Post test

169.53 ± 38.63

–67.9599

32.9128

–0.737

0.472

Post test

187.05 ± 84.78

HDL (mg/dl)

Post test

45.87 ± 2.85

–0.7644

2.1526

1.009

0.328

Post test

45.17 ± 2.87

VLDL (mg/dl)

Post test

33.89 ± 7.74

–13.4578

6.6578

–0.717

0.484

Post test

37.29 ± 16.90

LDL (mg/dl)

Post test

116.86 ± 40.55

–0.9194

16.5311

1.897

0.076

Post test

109.05 ± 37.97

TC-HDL Ratio (Ratio)

Post test

4.30 ± 0.93

–0.36889

0.44183

0.191

0.851

Post test

4.27 ± 0.95

LDL-HDL Ratio (Ratio)

Post test

2.57 ± 0.90

–0.09853

0.37735

1.242

0.232

Post test

2.43 ± 0.88

Data are expressed in mean, SD, t-value, CI and statistical significance. TC = Total Cholesterol; TG = Triglycerides; HDL = High density lipoprotein; VLDL = Very low density lipoprotein; LDL = Low density lipoprotein; CI = Confidence Interval; SD = Standard Deviation.

No substantial changes were seen on lipid parameters in AYUSH SN group.

According to the results depicted in Table 6, in the CYP-SN group cholesterol (p = 0.084) TG (p = 0.349), HDL (p = 0.387), LDL (p = 0.078), VLDL (p = 0.344), TC-HDL Ratio (p = 0.442), LDL-HDL Ratio (p = 0.192) shows no significant changes after the CYP-SN practice. Although the non- significant amelioration on cholesterol (225.5 ± 38.02 to 210.16 ± 29.28) triglycerides (193.33 ± 65.49 to 185.75 ± 75.54) and LDL (138.08 ± 29.67 to 125.93 ± 29.60) levels were noticed in CYP-SN group. Whereas no changes were seen on HDL, VLDL, TC-HDL Ratio, LDL-HDL Ratio.

Statistically no significant differences were seen on lipid parameters on Control group

Based on the results exhibited in Table 7, the cholesterol (p = 0.471) TG (p = 0.472), HDL (p = 0.328), LDL (p = 0.076), VLDL (p = 0.484), TC-HDL Ratio (p = 0.851), LDL-HDL Ratio (p = 0.232) shows no significant differences at baseline and after three months in control group.

Although, the minimal decreasing trend in TC (196.68 ± 41.38 to 191.65 ± 36.43) and LDL (116.86 ± 40.55 to 109.06 ± 37.97) values whereas increasing trend in TG (169.54 ± 38.63 to187.06 ± 84.78) values were observed in control group.

Table 8: Between group comparison for lipid profile in Control, CYP, and CYP-SN group

Lipid parameters

Test condition

Group Mean

Source of Variance

Sum of Squares

df

Mean Squares

F-value

P-value

Control

CYP

CYP- SN

TC (mg/dl)

Pre test

196.68

225.5

203.22

Between Group

6213.814

2

3106.907

1.468

0.240

N = 17

N = 12

N = 23

Within Group

103720.964

49

2116.754

Post test

191.64

210.16

193.21

Between Group

2888.846

2

1444.423

0.958

0.391

N = 17

N = 12

N = 23

Within Group

73917.462

49

1508.520

TG (mg/dl)

Pre test

169.53

193.33

138.65

Between Group

25263.572

2

12631.786

2.807

0.070

N = 17

N = 12

N = 23

Within Group

220544.103

49

4500.900

Post test

187.05

185.75

146

Between Group

21069.328

2

10534.664

1.860

0.167

N = 17

N = 12

N = 23

Within Group

277553.191

49

5664.351

HDL (mg/dl)

Pre test

45.87

48.75

48.52

Between Group

85.652

2

42.826

2.468

0.095

N = 17

N = 12

N = 23

Within Group

850.244

49

17.352

Post test

45.17

47.08

47.95

Between Group

76.425

2

38.213

1.743

0.186

N = 17

N = 12

N = 23

Within Group

1074.344

49

21.925

VLDL (mg/dl)

Pre test

33.89

38.66

27.71

Between Group

1012.551

2

506.276

2.809

0.070

N = 17

N = 12

N = 23

Within Group

8830.589

49

180.216

Post test

37.29

37.15

29.2

Between Group

828.161

2

414.081

1.832

0.171

N = 17

N = 12

N = 23

Within Group

11074.739

49

226.015

LDL (mg/dl)

Pre test

116.86

138.08

126.98

Between Group

3190.241

2

1595.121

0.933

0.400

N = 17

N = 12

N = 23

Within Group

83748.202

49

1709.147

Post test

109.05

125.93

116.49

Between Group

2005.710

2

1002.855

0.738

0.483

N = 17

N = 12

N = 23

Within Group

66592.237

49

1359.025

TC-HDL Ratio (Ratio)

Pre test

4.30

4.65

4.19

Between Group

1.635

2

0.818

0.856

0.431

N = 17

N = 12

N = 23

Within Group

46.824

49

0.956

Post test

4.27

4.52

4.09

Between Group

1.466

2

0.733

0.804

0.453

N = 17

N = 12

N = 23

Within Group

44.676

49

0.912

LDL-HDL Ratio (Ratio)

Pre test

2.57

2.86

2.63

Between Group

0.652

2

0.326

0.387

0.681

N = 17

N = 12

N = 23

Within Group

41.226

49

0.841

Post test

2.43

2.73

2.47

Between Group

0.734

2

0.367

0.479

0.622

N = 17

N = 12

N = 23

Within Group

37.507

49

0.765

Data are expressed in statistical significance. TC = Total Cholesterol; TG = Triglycerides; HDL = High density lipoprotein; VLDL = Very low density lipoprotein; LDL = Low density lipoprotein; CI = Confidence Interval; SD = Standard Deviation.

No group differences noticed among CYP Group, CYP-SN group and Control group

The between the group differences were also analyzed in the present study and it was found that among CYP Group, CYP-SN group and Control group there was statistically no significant differences were found among the selected groups at pre and post levels (Table 8).

Discussion

The present study was designed to analyze the role of CYP and CYP-SN on the lipid profile of dyslipidemia subjects. Results of the investigation revealed that a three-month intervention resulted in elevation of HDL-C levels in the group that had undergone CYP as well as CYP-SN protocol. This implied benefits of Surya namaskar in modifying lipid profile, reflecting an improvement in dyslipidemia which is a condition with abnormally elevated levels of lipids in the blood.

It is of utmost importance to identify and address the dyslipidemia in initial stages as the progression can lead to atherosclerosis and advanced cardiovascular disease. Dyslipidemia also results in abnormalities in lipolysis, triglyceride metabolism and free fatty acid turnover. Chronic exposure to increased free fatty acids leads to impaired insulin secretion and thus leading to diabetes (16). Maintaining a healthy glycemic control is a major factor that can regulate the prevention of dyslipidemia and prevent major cardiovascular events (17). Moreover, Taliya et al. did a cross-sectional survey on the western U.P population (India), and they reported the rise in fasting blood sugar levels is related to the dysregulated lipid parameters (18). Nagarathna et al also pointed out the positive correlation of HbA1c with LDL, TC and LDL whereas negative correlation was found between the HbA1c and HDL Levels (14).

Earlier investigators have explored the impact of Yoga protocol on different medical conditions (12,13). Some of these studies exhibited a significant impact of yoga, whereas some showed promising but inconclusive results on different medical conditions. Moreover, few studies have investigated the effects of Yoga on subjects with the risk of CVD, i.e., dyslipidemia. That underscored the need and relevance of the present study for management of Dyslipidemia and prevention of related ailments such as diabetes and CVD.

A study of ‘40-days slow SN Yoga protocol’ with T2DM patients reported significantly lower levels of LDL, VLDL, TG, TC but no significant difference was found in HDL values (19). Another study of ‘14-week SN protocol’ with severe ischemic heart disease patients revealed an increase in HDL (20).

The results of the present investigation are supported by a study of diabetic patients (11,254 Indian adults in age range 20–70 years) in whom practicing Yoga protocol resulted in a significant alteration in lipid profile values of patients of both genders with high risk (≥60 on Indian diabetes risk score). In this nationwide rural and urban community-based randomized controlled trial, reduced serum TC, triglycerides, LDL and increased HDL were reported in Yoga group as compared to the control group (21). Studies have shown that three months of practice of Yoga protocol, a significant percentage of diabetics with abnormal lipid levels reverted to normal levels of cholesterol (189.38 mg/dl) from the baseline (232.34 mg/dL) with an 18% reduction. A direct positive correlation was found between dyslipidemia and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), where the lipid levels increased as HbA1c increased (22). Concomitantly, studies have emphasized the therapeutic role of Yoga, resulting in significant elevation of HDL cholesterol and reduction of TC, TG, LDL and VLDL (17,18).

Findings of the present study revealed positive impact of yoga in patients with dyslipidemia. Yoga and Ayurveda which are traditional Indian sciences which put focus on healthy lifestyles and maintaining a healthy balance between body and mind functions. Though some of researchers have explored the impact of yoga in diabetes and CVD, but research on impact of yoga on Dyslipidemia is still nascent. There is a need to identify the factors which can influence the impact of yoga on patients with dyslipidemia.

Yoga asanas activate various enzymes which can further stimulate their substrates, leading to the reduction of LDL and TG. Yoga can alter lipid profile, owing to increased hepatic lipase and lipoprotein lipase. Yoga has been found to be helpful in equal body fat distribution and managing the central obesity leading to upregulation of insulin receptors and sensitivity and a change in the level of insulin to left with normalization of insulin glucagon ratio (23). Pranayama increases blood supply to muscles increasing the insulin receptor profile in muscles and increasing the uptake of glucose by the cells. This further reduces levels of blood sugar (24,25).

Researchers have tried to identify attributable factors in the effectiveness of exercise for lipid profiles. It was found that the physical activity lead to higher HDL levels and lowering the concentration of VLDL-C and TG (2628). Therefore, HDL have an important part in managing cholesterol levels.

In line with studies exploring the changes in HDL and cholesterol brought by exercise, some investigators have studied the impact of yoga practices on cholesterol. The outcome of Yoga intervention in the present study are in accordance with earlier findings (2935) indicating a significant decrease in variables of obesity like BMI, blood pressure and total lipids.

Studies have revealed that after 90 days of yoga intervention, significant reduction was observed in levels of serum total cholesterol in hypertensive patients, serum TG and LDL-C, and significant increase in levels of serum HDL-C (23). Others have suggested that yoga helps in stimulation of Carnitine Palmitoyl Transferase (CPT) system and sterol regulatory element binding proteins, thus impacting fatty acid metabolism (23,36).

Many recent Pharmacological interventions in treatment of dyslipidemia have focused on reduction of LDL-C and elevation of HDL-C. Reducing LDL-C has been a deciding factor in lowering the risk and management of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular health problems. The medications for treatment of dyslipidemia have shown promising results. Rosuvastatin (10–40 mg) has been found to decrease level of LDL-C by 52–63%, and increasing levels of HDL-C by up to 14% and reducing the levels of TG by up to 28% (37).

A positive impact was found in 100T2DM subjects after three months Yoga intervention (13). Investigators also have reported decrease in mean value of TC i.e. 240.36 mg/dL (High) to 214.11 mg/dL (borderline) after Yoga intervention for four months in 158 Type 2 Diabetes and dyslipidemia patients when compared to treated group taking sulphonyl urea (38).

Yoga intervention can delay the dyslipidemia associated health problems. However, there is need to do extensive research on impact of yoga on different parameters of dyslipidemia. Further, more randomized controlled trials are required on different populations and locations to explore the potential impact of yoga on dyslipidemia. The results of the present investigation are in contradiction to a few studies (39,40) which reported that changes did not occurred all the parameters. They had reported that there was not significant result observed in patients with any family history of dyslipidemia after yoga intervention. This may be interpreted as, family history might not have any co-relationship in management of dyslipidemia in diabetic patient practising yoga intervention for short periods.

To conclude, yoga is a promising intervention in management and prevention of dyslipidemia. Besides the medication, regular yoga practice can improve not only physical health but mental well-being too.

Strength

This study was a randomized controlled trial and followed CONSORT guidelines that enhances its credibility.

Limitation

The sample size was reduced due to drop outs. Thus, in each group, the final sample was small.

The study duration is very less for the protocol to be fully effective in combination with low-intensity type training. Since the study was conducted in harsh winters in an in-person mode with an added fear of Covid-19 infection, many participants dropped out of the study. Effect of the Common yoga protocol and Surya Namaskar on dyslipidemia individuals was evaluated. Hence, specific yoga protocol for dyslipidemia individuals was not used and can be considered a limitation of the study.

Conclusion

Three-month CYP and CYP-SN resulted in increased HDL-C levels in the group that had undergone common yoga protocol as well as common yoga protocol along with Surya Namaskar, implying the benefits of Surya Namaskar in managing dyslipidemia. Enhanced intensity of Surya Namaskar can lead to more impactful dyslipidemia management.

Acknowledgement

The authors want to thank all the supporting team members of the Haryana Yoga Council for their help and support. Also, the authors are thankful to the Department of AYUSH, Haryana Government for their financial support.

Authors’ contribution

JA: Conceptualization of the study (Yoga Intervention)
DS: Yoga instructor for the study and collected the Data
HM: Yoga instructor for the study and collected the Data
KM: Performed the Analysis, writing and editing
YB: Wrote the draft
RV: Writing – review and editing
SJ: Design the study and writing, review and editing
SA: Writing - reviewing and editing
MG: Writing - reviewing and editing
NK: Performed the Analysis and Writing
JA: Writing - reviewing and editing
GS: Reviewing and editing

Abbreviations

CVD

Cardiovascular diseases

CHD

Coronary Heart diseases

CKD

Chronic kidney disorder

AYUSH

Ayurveda, Yoga & Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha and Homeopathy

SN

Surya Namaskar

CYP

Common Yoga Protocol

CYP-SN

Common Yoga Protocol

HDL-C

High-density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol

LDL-C

Low-density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol

VLDL-C

Very low-density lipoprotein

TC

Total cholesterol

TG

Triglyceride

IEC

Institutional ethical committee

Ethical statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and Ethical clearance was taken from Haryana Yog council institutional ethical committee (EC/NEW/INST/2022/2489).

Source of funding

This study was funded by the Department of AYUSH, Government of Haryana, India

Conflict of interest

The authors do not have any conflict of interest.

 

Received Date: 08-02-22; Revised Date: 08-07-22
Accepted Date: 13-07-22

References

1. Grundy SM Hypertriglyceridemia, insulin resistance, and the metabolic syndrome. Am. J. Cardiol. 1999, 13;83(9):25–9.

2. O’Meara JG, Kardia SL, Armon JJ, Brown CA, Boerwinkle E, Turner ST. Ethnic and sex differences in the prevalence, treatment, and control of dyslipidemia among hypertensive adults in the GENOA study. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(12):1313–1318. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.164.12.1313

3. Joshi SR, Anjana RM, Deepa M, et al. Prevalence of dyslipidemia in urban and rural India: the ICMR-INDIAB study. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e96808. Published 2014 May 9. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096808

4. Brown CD, Higgins M, Donato KA, et al. Body mass index and the prevalence of hypertension and dyslipidemia. Obes Res. 2000;8(9):605–619. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2000.79

5. Gupta R, Rao RS, Misra A, S.S. Recent trends in epidemiology of dyslipidemias in India. Indian Hear. journal. 2017, 1;69(3):38.

6. Amarenco P, Kim JS; Executive Committee of the Treat Stroke to Target Trial. LDL Cholesterol Targets after Ischemic Stroke. Reply. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(15):1480–1481. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2001195

7. Aradine E, Hou Y, Cronin CA, Chaturvedi S. Current Status of Dyslipidemia Treatment for Stroke Prevention. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2020;20(8):31. Published 2020 Jun 22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-020-01052-4

8. Karan A, Engelgau M, Mahal A. The household-level economic burden of heart disease in India. Trop. Med. Int. Heal. 2014, 19, 581–591.

9. Mehra P, Anand A, Nagarathna R, et al. Role of Mind-Body Intervention on Lipid Profile: A Cross-sectional Study. Int J Yoga. 2021;14(2):168–172. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijoy.IJOY_51_20

10. Chauhan A, Semwal DK, Mishra SP, Semwal RB. Yoga Practice Improves the Body Mass Index and Blood Pressure: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Yoga. 2017;10(2):103–106. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijoy.IJOY_46_16

11. Bhavanani AB, Ramanathan M, Balaji R, Pushpa D. Comparative immediate effect of different yoga asanas on heart rate and blood pressure in healthy young volunteers. Int J Yoga. 2014;7(2):89–95. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-6131.133870

12. Metri K, Bhargav H, Hemant Bhargav P. Role of Yoga in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Hypothetical Review Integrative medicine/psychiatry View project Yoga Based Intervention for Opioid Dependence: Efficacy and Potential Mechanisms View project Role of Yoga in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Hypothetical Review. Artic. J. Nephrol. Ther. 2014.

13. Shantakumari N, Sequeira S, El deeb R. Effects of a yoga intervention on lipid profiles of diabetes patients with dyslipidemia. Indian Heart J. 2013;65(2):127–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2013.02.010

14. Raghuram N, Ram V, Majumdar V, et al. Effectiveness of a Yoga-Based Lifestyle Protocol (YLP) in Preventing Diabetes in a High-Risk Indian Cohort: A Multicenter Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial (NMB-Trial). Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021;12:664657. Published 2021 Jun 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.664657

15. Mahesh NK, Kumar A, Bhat KG, Verma N. Role of yoga therapy on lipid profile in patients of hypertension and prehypertension. Int J Adv Med. 2018 Mar;5:321.

16. Ebbert JO, Jensen MD. Fat depots, free fatty acids, and dyslipidemia. Nutrients. 013;5(2):498–508. Published 2013 Feb 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu5020498

17. Ladeia AM, Adan L, Couto-Silva AC, Hiltner A, Guimarães AC. Lipid profile correlates with glycemic control in young patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Prev Cardiol. 2006;9(2):82–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1520-037x.2006.4019.x

18. Taliyan S, Nagtilak S, Parashar P, Rastogi A. Correlation between Glycated hemoglobin and Lipid profile in Type 2 Diabetic population of district Meerut International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research Correlation between Glycated hemoglobin and Lipid profile in Type 2 Diabetic population of district Meerut, U.P. Shorya Taliyan al / Int. J. Biomed. Adv. Res. 2016, 7, 7.

19. Singh S, Malhotra V, Singh KP, Sharma SB, Madhu SV, Tandon OP. A preliminary report on the role of yoga asanas on oxidative stress in non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Indian J Clin Biochem. 2001;16(2):216–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02864866

20. Mahajan AS, Reddy KS, Sachdeva U. Lipid profile of coronary risk subjects following yogic lifestyle intervention. Indian Heart J. 1999;51(1):37–40.

21. Nagarathna R, Kumar S, Anand A, et al. Effectiveness of Yoga Lifestyle on Lipid Metabolism in a Vulnerable Population-A Community Based Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Medicines (Basel). 2021;8(7):37. Published 2021 Jul 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines8070037

22. Hussain A, Ali I, Ijaz M, Rahim A. Correlation between hemoglobin A1c and serum lipid profile in Afghani patients with type 2 diabetes: hemoglobin A1c prognosticates dyslipidemia. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2017;8(4):51–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042018817692296

23. Sarode S, Mishra N, Tadas S. “Study of Impact of Yoga on Physiological And Biochemical Parameters in Hypertensive And Normal Subjects.’’ IOSR J. Dent. Med. Sci. e-ISSN 2017, 16, 114–121.

24. Balaji PA, Varne SR, Ali SS. Physiological Effects of Yogic Practices and Transcendental Meditation in Health and Disease. N. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2012, 4, 442.

25. Ansari RM. Kapalabhati pranayama: An answer to modern day polycystic ovarian syndrome and coexisting metabolic syndrome? Int. J. Yoga 2016, 9, 163.

26. Pyörälä K, Laakso M, Uusitupa M. Diabetes and atherosclerosis: an epidemiologic view. Diabetes Metab Rev. 1987;3(2):463–524. https://doi.org/10.1002/dmr.5610030206

27. Szapary PO, Bloedon LT, Foster GD. Physical activity and its effects on lipids. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2003;5(6):488–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-003-0112-2

28. Asikainen TM, Miilunpalo S, Kukkonen-Harjula K, et al. Walking trials in postmenopausal women: effect of low doses of exercise and exercise fractionization on coronary risk factors. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2003;13(5):284–292. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0838.2003.00331.x

29. Madanmohan, Bhavanani AB, Dayanidy G, Sanjay Z, Basavaraddi IV. Effect of yoga therapy on reaction time, biochemical parameters and wellness score of peri and post-menopausal diabetic patients. Int J Yoga. 2012;5(1):10–15. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-6131.91696

30. Ankad RB, Herur A, Patil S, Shashikala GV, Chinagudi S. Effect of short-term pranayama and meditation on cardiovascular functions in healthy individuals. Heart Views. 2011;12(2):58–62. https://doi.org/10.4103/1995-705X.86016

31. Mody BS. Acute effects of Surya Namaskar on the cardiovascular & metabolic system. J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther. 2011, 15, 343–347.

32. Pal A, Srivastava N, Tiwari S, Verma NS, Narain VS, Agrawal GG, Natu SM, Kumar K. Effect of yogic practices on lipid profile and body fat composition in patients of coronary artery disease. Complement. Ther. Med. 2011, 19, 122–127.

33. Telles S, Singh N, Joshi M, Balkrishna A. Post traumatic stress symptoms and heart rate variability in Bihar flood survivors following yoga: a randomized controlled study. BMC Psychiatry 2010 101 2010, 10, 1–10.

34. Gopal A, Mondal S, Gandhi A, Arora S, Bhattacharjee J. Effect of integrated yoga practices on immune responses in examination stress – A preliminary study. Int. J. Yoga 2011, 4, 26.

35. Tundwala V, Gupta RP, Kumar S, Singh VB, Br S, Dayal P, Prakash P. A Study On Effect Of Yoga And Various Asanas On Obesity, Hypertension And Dyslipidemia. Int. J. Basic Appl. Med. Sci. 2012, 2, 93–98.

36. Horowitz JF, Klein S. Lipid metabolism during endurance exercise. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2000, 72, 558S-563S.

37. Rosenson RS. Rosuvastatin: a new inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase for the treatment of dyslipidemia. http://dx.doi.org/10.1586/14779072.1.4.495 2014, 1, 495–505.

38. Mohammed R, Banu A, S Imran, Jaiswal RK. Importance of yoga in diabetes and dyslipidemia. Int. J. Res. Med. Sci. 2017, 4, 3504–3508.

39. Sahay BK. Role of Yoga in Diabetes. 2007, 55.

40. Bijlani RL, Vempati RP, Yadav RK, et al. A brief but comprehensive lifestyle education program based on yoga reduces risk factors for cardiovascular disease and diabetes mellitus. J Altern Complement Med. 2005;11(2):267–274. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2005.11.267